[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 13:00:36 -0700
• References: <008d01c210ac$60c381c0$0300a8c0@skonnardomni> <3D04FA4B.9F61696@p...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529

Paul Prescod wrote:

> Oh really? So I guess I'm hallucinating when I see client and server
> implementations of HTTP each in less than a thousand lines of code. 

Up through late 1995, the Yahoo server was 800 lines of C code whacked 
up by Filo.  HTTP is not hard to implement even today, at the protocol 
level.  If you want to do it in a general-purpose way with application 
dispatching and good performance, yep, the problem is bigger. -Tim

• References:
  • RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread