[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

• To: ricko@a... (Rick Jelliffe)
• Subject: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 09:20:33 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l... (XML-Dev Mailing list)
• In-reply-to: <02d701c21214$fce83f00$4bc8a8c0@A...> from "Rick Jelliffe" at Jun 12, 2002 11:28:06 PM

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> 1) I have a growing set of documents, and I want to start adding documents
> which have no DOCTYPE declaration.  But I am happy with DTDs
> so far, and want to put off deciding about RELAX or XML Schemas etc
> for a year or so.  So I just want to validate with my current DTD without
> needing a DOCTYPE declaration.

In that case you don't need DSDL at all: this is a non-use case.
Instead, you can just either use Sun MSV or use SP with an appropriate
catalogue and the XML options.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ...
• Next by Date: When do tags stop being a good idea?
• Previous by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread