[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] > > Umm... not exactly. You can choose to > process it as a sign (no need to dereference) > or to process it as a symbol because of the > record of authority. Yes, that is a good > thing because it is your choice. In other > words, the choice to exercise a processing > asset is local. You choose what "correct > processing" means and you get to make that > choice once or every time you use that process. That's to misunderstand RDF (or give it too much credit, take your pick). URIs are handy because we can create new unique ones with minimal centralization and fuss. In RDF they're just globals, are opaque, and in that respect there is no choice. Provenance is an important use case for RDF. Dereferencing URI refs for more information is outside the scope of RDF. There isn't an 'official' processing model for RDF, its standardization to date has been careful to avoid talking about processing, beyond what entailments can be made via the model theory and the minimal amount of things you say or imply when specifying serialization syntaxes like the XML. Bill de hÓra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPP5ACeaWiFwg2CH4EQKe8QCfV7b5vHJbIQmvqh97DrPSyjxqI7kAoOId JlHttcz4d3im/fm1uvQ1Az0l =x7/v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|