[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

• To: <aarons@d...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:13:30 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <00e901c2125a$c88d3850$0400a8c0@skonnardt20>

> Aaron:
> If HTTP is an application protocol, I don't see how SOAP 
> can't be...

> Aaron:
> First, I personally don't refer to SOAP as an "application 
> protocol" but rather as a "messaging framework". 

?


> It's a fallacy of composition to draw the conclusion that an 
> "application protocol" MUST have the characteristics you list 
> above just because most of the commonly-thought-of 
> application protocols share those characteristics.

No it's not. I'm still interested in how you can say "If HTTP is an
application protocol, I don't see how SOAP can't be". Did you imply a
messaging framework when you said application protocol?

Bill de hÓra 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• References:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread