[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?


Re:  XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
In a message dated 10/05/02 21:32:06 GMT Daylight Time, jonathan.robie@d... writes:


The sarcasm sometimes gets in the way of this discussion.


Jonathan,

You may want to consider the possibility that sarcasm is way to indicate that at least some people on this list perceive that they are not being heard.

It's a reason


that some people prefer not to hang out on XML-Dev. If you want to increase
communication between the designers of XML standards and XML-Dev, give us
lots of well reasoned, technical discussion, and be polite to us.


Jonathan,

Clear, concise answers from WG members to questions would help increase communication.

I have asked you what is the vision for XPath and each time you have (in the posts I have seen) failed to answer.

How am I to interpret that? These are some possibilities that come to mind:
1. A clear strategy exists but you decline/refuse to share it. Impression given - W3C does not consider us significant enough to have access to that information.
2. No clear strategy exists. Impression given - you don't want us to realise how ad hoc all this is.

There are other variants but hopefully you get the idea.

So, I will ask you once more: "What is the vision/strategy for XPath 2.0?".

Also, you may want to consider the reality that communication involves listening. You have a pretty clear agenda that you want detailed technical points (only) raised.

Effectively you are signalling that you and/or the WG do not want more strategic questions raised/discussed. Can you understand that that comes across as patronising?

Speaking of politeness. Shouldn't that cut two ways? Michael may have been totally accurate to refer to my post as an "absurd caricature" but wouldn't it have been more constructive to respond along the lines of "Your concerns are unfounded. We have already considered the needs of those XPath users who don't (for some uses) want to use typing in XPath 2.0 and if you read Chapter X.XX in [document] you will see that we have this concern covered.".

As the importance that W3C specs have on real people's lives increases W3C and its WGs will need to be much better at communication (including listening) to avoid transmitting negative patronising perceptions.

Andrew Watt

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.