[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: RES

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: RESTTutorial)
• From: "John Evdemon" <jevdemon@a...>
• Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 14:39:50 -0400
• In-reply-to: <1093E8BAEB6AD411997300508BDF0A7C0A11559D@USHEM204>
• Priority: normal

On 22 May 2002 at 14:26, Long, Craig Z wrote:

> 		Hey,  I'm coming in on the tail-end of this... point me to
> the article (USA Today) that is being discussed.


------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	John Evdemon <jevdemon@a...>
To:             	xml-dev@l...
Subject:        	RE:  ANN: REST Tutorial
Date sent:      	Tue, 21 May 2002 10:33:01 -0400

On 21 May 2002 at 9:11, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Because anything truly new is also unrecognizable.  It 
> will sit on the shelf while the insanely restless play 
> with it and adapt it.  Over some period of time they 
> will get results that others will covet and emulate. 

Or blow the budget on something that may never gain acceptance.  This 

popped up this morning as a rather painful reminder of the trends and 

bandwagons the industry keeps jumping onto:

http://www.usatoday.com/money/general/2002/05/20/squander.htm

------- End of forwarded message -------

• References:
  • RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: RESTTutorial)
    • From: "Long, Craig Z" <craig.long@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: R ESTTutorial)
• Next by Date: RE: Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: AN N: RESTTutorial)
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: R ESTTutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread