[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions

• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 13 May 2002 14:26:58 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020513111151.03cddba8@n...>
• References: <1XPOCAZWNKQK43XUXT4XR706PLGAOK.3cdfd29a@MChamp><1XPOCAZWNKQK43XUXT4XR706PLGAOK.3cdfd29a@MChamp> <5.1.0.14.0.20020513111151.03cddba8@n...>

On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 14:13, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> I think Mike is talking about types used for data in the XML instance. At 
> that level, XPath 1.0 / XSLT 1.0 doesn't really have even floating point 
> numbers - these are in the programming model, but not in the data that is 
> manipulated.

That approach (numbers in the programming model, not the data) seems
brilliantly appropriate to XML's marked-up text approach.

Downright ingenious, even.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• Next by Date: RE: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread