[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: The vision for XPath 2.0
> What is the rationale for XPath 2.0 being sacrificed on the > altar of XQuery? > > The snippets of information that have emerged from WG members > hint that > little thought has been given to what XPath 2.0 should be, > other than to > serve as a handmaiden to XQuery 1.0. Is that is > mis-characterisation of the situation? Yes, it's an absurd caricature. > > What was the vision for XPath 2.0? It would be good to be > informed that there > is a clear, practical and relevant vision for XPath 2.0. > XPath is now being used in half a dozen different scenarios: not only XSLT and XQuery, but XForms, XPointer, DOM, etc. All these scenarios have different requirements (or perceived requirements) as to how comprehensive the language should be versus how big it should be. There is a vision that it should meet everyone's needs for a compact declarative expression language for access to the contents of XML documents. It is true that a lot of the intellectual input into XPath 2.0 has come from the XQuery effort. But the policy has always been to take those parts of XQuery functionality that meet a general need, and leave out those that don't. Don't assume that the current boundary as to which parts of XQuery are in XPath and which aren't is in any way final: it changes by the day. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@n... work: Michael.Kay@s...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|