[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
| Anyway, I am glad to hear that Oracle isn't supporting the bloated XSLT | 2.0/XPath 2.0 scenario. Maybe Jonathan or Michael will yet shed some light on | who is. Andrew, I made the point that Oracle is not *pushing* to make XSLT a replacement for SQL -- since we already have SQL -- not that we would not support XSLT 2.0 or XPath 2.0. Wanted to clarify that. :-) When XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 go RECOMMENDATION, we have all intent of supporting them. Along the way, we may fight some battles for some favorite features, or point out issues based on implementation experience, or try to convince others in the group to see things from a similar perspective, but in the end remember that we are just one voice in a group of many, so if the majority decides to go in a particular direction, in the end, you march that way, too, for the good of the group as a whole. We definitely did favor the idea of not having two completely parallel syntaxes to accomplish nearly the same types of queries, so we were in support of unifying the XPath and XQuery missions so users using the two syntaxes together would not have to learn two. What will be the popular subset of the common syntax that most users find "just enough to be what they need" is still to be determined. __________________________________________________________ Steve Muench - Developer, Product Mgr, Evangelist, Author Simplify J2EE and EJB Development with BC4J http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/htdocs/j2ee_bc4j.html Building Oracle XML Apps, www.oreilly.com/catalog/orxmlapp
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|