[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Penance for misspent attributes
Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...> wrote: |> From: Arjun Ray [mailto:aray@n...] |> Hidden here is (IMHO) a deep critique of SAX as a useful API. | | I don't know. XML modellers faq: | | Q: Why are you putting stuff in attributes? | A: I can't be arsed to code a buffer. | | Seems more like gonzo laziness to me. Sounds like the Path of Least Resistance to me. Not everybody is a theoretician, with a grasp of what generally useful feature could be missing. For example, what if SAX offered a semantic value stack in parallel with the open element stack it has to maintain internally? If every app that needs one has to reinvent it, quite a few apps might be "redesigned" not to need one. I think Simon was saying, inter alia, *that's* a dead end.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|