[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 01:41:14 +1000
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B43E@HQ5>

 From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
 
> > 1.  The web would not have emerged without non-royalty 
> > based standards
...
> The problem is that is speculation.   We don't know how that 
> would have worked.  We have the counterexamples of PDF and 
> MPEG, to name two, to show that such encumbered systems can 
> succeed.   Patented technology shows up regularly in hardware 
> and software.
 
On the other hand, we did have Compuserv and other 
proprietary access layers, and they did not become the WWW.
So it is not speculation to pit proprietary against free for the WWW,
more a matter of judging to what extent the WWW succeeded
because it had a free and open basis.

Again, you say PDF has succeeded, but for all the software developers
who Adobe didn't grant rights to use their PDF SDK, before there
were free alternatives, PDF is not a success. 

> Again, "us vs them".  This is one more example of why that 
> article IS polarizing.

The polarization is created by those grabbing rights, not the victims!
 
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
 

• References:
  • RE: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Web Services Mapping Capabilities?
• Next by Date: RE: organization (was RE: frustration)
• Previous by thread: Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• Next by thread: RE: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread