[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: PSVI formalization


Re:  PSVI formalization
Jonathan Robie wrote:
> The current PSVI contains all the right data, but it is much too detailed,
> and it doesn't seem to be based on the abstractions people will want to use
> for everyday processing. I think we need a better representation of this
> information. The Formal Description is closer. Doing this right will take
> some time and thought.

The information in the current PSVI also needs to be separated into more
than one bucket. Validation and type information (I can't remember what
other sorts of information are in the PSVI) are logically separate
beasts, and it is quite reasonable to use one without the other.

-- Ron

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.