[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
I'm REALLY late on this thread (I tend to catch up thread by thread when I have time) but I have the advantage of having read the entire thread at once. >>6. I claim that hitting an 80/20 point is a strong predictor of >>success (positive and also negative in that technologies that don't >>hit it usually don't succeed), that there are a few less strong >>predictors (happy programmers, good early implementations, technical >>elegance), and that military backing is a weakish negative >>indicators. >>I had hoped that people would hit on some of these points. >>Are there any technologies that DID hit a clear 80/20 point >>that lost out in the marketplace to more complex competitors ( >>that weren't already entrenched)? Why didn't anybody mention Adobe's Photoshop and Premier? They're both famous for their complexity and impenetrable interface, and they both dominate their respective niches. Photoshop, in particular, defeated some very significant opposition. Only Paintshop Pro seems to be still hanging in there ... and it sells to a completely different price/performance need. Dan Mabbutt
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|