[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Naive Question about NS 1.1
Richard Tobin wrote: > > ... > But consider this, from a stylesheet: > > <xsl:template match="x:child"> > > The parser doesn't know that x:child is going to be interpreted as a > QName; it can't distinguish it from something like: > > <db:read file="c:mydatabase"> > > Only the XSLT processor knows what the attribute means. Since it knows that as soon as the element tag has been parsed, it could well act on that knowledge and discard it. The same is true of element content. > So the parser > must (somehow or other) provide the XSLT processor with the list of > bindings at each point in the document, and that's what some people > don't like. Is the problem with the local declarations? Or with those which are imputed? And with expecting that they remain consistent and/or expressive in the presence of mutation? > > -- Richard > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|