[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: [good] Question about NS 1.1


RE:  [good] Question about NS 1.1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
> Sent: 09 April 2002 16:08
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  [good] Question about NS 1.1
> 
> On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 11:02, james anderson wrote:
> > 
> > the infoset is not itself the problem. the problem begins where one
> > expects or specifies that the set of "in-scope" namespaces be available
> > as a static value.
> > 
> > i'm curious how that came to pass.
> 
> I _think_ it's because of QNames in attribute/element values, but it may
> also have to do with canonicalization discussions.  I seem to remember
> it being an issue for the long-ago XML Fragment discussions, but I'm not
> sure.

If that's the case then why not limit 'in-scope' to mean those namespaces 
used by the element, or it's direct element or attribute content?

Wouldn't that staunch the bleeding?

Cheers,

L.

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.