[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
Ronald Bourret wrote: > Which is an extremely good thing. It is unfortunate that namespaces were > ever separate from XML, and I'm reasonably certain that the authors of > both specs would have preferred them to be integrated, but were > prevented from so doing due to timing issues. Which timing issue - the absence of schemas? Without them, we might have had XML with namespaces, but no processors capable of validation, unless we were willing to kludge DTDs on an ad hoc basis. -- Regards, Marcus Carr email: mcarr@a... ___________________________________________________________________ Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au ___________________________________________________________________ "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|