[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: What A Document Means
Quite. Too much double speak. len -----Original Message----- From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@c...] [Bullard, Claude L (Len]> > > That is the direction I thought they might be headed in with that, > but without a reference, I wasn't sure. So it is an infoset. That > is a bit vague and doesn't quite tell us why it is an expensive > approach, or precisely how it determines a document's "meaning" > except insofar as information items are grouped. In other words, > we can use the infoset to describe it's meaning as a well-formed > document (as document is defined therein), but not the meaning > of the content. ... Let's also remember that an http: url retrieves a "representation of a resource". What then is the "document"? Is it the resource or the particular instance of its representation? I presume that it is the instance, in whatever MIME (or infoset) from it may have, but it would be well to have this distinction spelled out.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|