[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: lots of WS reading material

• To: 'John Cowan' <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: lots of WS reading material
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:45:11 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

<phil>Oneness sees only a continuum and does not judge 
for it has made that which it would judge and 
loves that which it has made.</phil>  

If you like, we can discuss the proper roles of 
Dharma, Artha, and Kama as related to power over 
Karma, but we should go to a different list. :-)

Why does one need to understand the role of the 
different specifications?

Because it makes a difference in what is normatively 
referenced if one knows which set of requirements 
contain system specifications that introduce system 
dependencies.  It is not a matter of inferior or 
superior, but of lifecycle design.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> That would tend to suggest that for the XML on The 
> Web system, the Infoset specification is core and 
> that XML 1.0 is a syntax mapping corresponding to 
> a subset of SGML.

Why do people have to take this superior-inferior, I-win-you-lose
point of view?  Why can't the syntax and the infoset just be two
ways of looking at the blackbird?  Light is the left hand of darkness,
darkness the right hand of light.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: lots of WS reading material
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: Re: W3C Successes (RE: W3C Cultureand Aims )
• Next by Date: RE: What is "the Web"
• Previous by thread: Re: lots of WS reading material
• Next by thread: Re: lots of WS reading material
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread