[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really ad
At 08:36 PM 4/22/2002 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >That is indeed (or so I believe) in progress, but the W3C is unwilling >to impose openness, *especially* retroactively, on its WGs. Absolutely -- and new charters of existing working groups and new groups are asked to discuss the access issue -- though, as far as I know, open access has not been imposed upon a group against their will. It's far more than grandstanding. Look at the quip a few days ago about an IRC transcript -- imagine any comment, no matter how flip, no matter how devil's advocate, no matter how pointed, could be read by anyone -- and then misinterpreted, taken out of context, or otherwise manipulated, and then you see headlines or email "flashes" about how Company Y thinks Technology Z is a waste of time, yet they claim to support that Standard!?!, someone's lying to us! That guy is from Company Y, so he's speaking the Official Company Party Line on this!!!! No amount of disclaimers will go around that -- public input *is* available, any time after an initial draft is published. You don't have to wait for a special call for it, read it and comment. Suggestions of improprieties (what dastardly improprieties could there be anyway? Oh! My! Company Y and Company Z, official enemies, actually AGREED on something!!!) simply because you can't see letter and verse of every conversion are just downright paranoid. Ann Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc. http://www.webgeek.com/ What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|