[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1


Re:  WD for Namespaces 1.1
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 07:20:21PM +0100, Richard Tobin wrote:
> It's intended that Namespaces 1.1 will be strongly tied to XML 1.1, so
> that it will only apply to XML 1.1 documents.  XML 1.0-only parsers
> will reject documents labelled 1.1 anyway, and Namespaces-1.1-aware
> processors will apply Namespaces 1.0 to 1.0 documents and Namespaces
> 1.1 to 1.1 documents.

Then why do we need a requirements document for Namespaces 1.1 per se?

Is there a good argument why Namespaces-1.1 *shouldn't* be rolled
into the XML-1.1 req/draft?  So what if XML-1.1 is a few pages
larger; the post-hoc addition of Namespaces to XML has caused a
lot of problems over the years.  

Removing an external requirement/dependency should be a *good* thing here.

Z.


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.