[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: sense on XML from MS

• To: 'Mike Champion' <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: sense on XML from MS
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 11:10:58 -0500

Further down is better stuff:

"Loose coupling is central to the nature of Web services-based application integration. That's why it seems to me that the right model for XML in Web services is a message-oriented, document-based one rather than one based on remote procedure calls."

Strong encapsulation, negotiate exchange types for a duration (document types change 
too), trust but validate, never ever ever let the marketing people into the  
process until after the schemas are done.

len


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...]



4/11/2002 10:59:48 AM, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> wrote:

I agree, that's a very thought-provoking piece.  Another article I just noticed 
yesterday is also well worth careful thought: Adam Bosworth on loosely coupled 
architectures for web services. 
http://www.fawcette.com/xmlmag/2002_04/magazine/departments/endtag/

"The only real success story to date in the world of loose coupling is the Web 
itself. ... The only thing the browser knows is the wire format (usually HTML) and 
the protocol." 






-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• Prev by Date: Re: sense on XML from MS
• Next by Date: RE: sense on XML from MS
• Previous by thread: RE: sense on XML from MS
• Next by thread: RE: sense on XML from MS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread