[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
Amelia A Lewis wrote: > Here's a proposal for XML 1.1 + Namespaces 1.1: namespace declarations are > decreed not to apply to attribute or element content (listen for the > screams). An application that wants something of that sort gets to invent > its own attributes or elements to create the definitions, if it wants to > store QNames in element or attribute content. I'm ambivalent about this. QNames in content sound like a Really Bad Idea on the face of it, but on the other hand of all the RECs to come out of the W3C, XSLT is the only one in which namespace issues don't cause a tremendous headache to end users. It shifts all the pain onto XSLT implementors (thanks, Mike :-). I'm not sure how this could be accomplished without QNames in content. --Joe English jenglish@f...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|