[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 17:33, Richard Tobin wrote: > >Is there a good argument why Namespaces-1.1 *shouldn't* be rolled > >into the XML-1.1 req/draft? > > A true unification of the XML and Namespaces spec would only make > sense if various other things were done, in particular dealing with > the special-case "pseudo-namespaced" attributes xml:lang and > xml:space. This would be a good thing, but we decided not to add that > to our task-list right now. I guess I'm just curious - what exactly does "deal with... xml:lang and xml:space" mean? I thought Namespaces in XML already defined a namespace for them in section 4... -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|