[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Naive Question about NS 1.1
I think I'm misunderstanding something, can anyone point where my train of thought is being derailed: - The Infoset defines that the namespace information items for an element are all those that are in scope. i.e. defined on this element or it's ancestors. - This leads to bleeding of namespaces from ancestors causing the problems cited in the NS 1.1 Reqs. w.r.t SOAP/XQuery - This leads to revising the namespace spec to allow undeclaring of namespaces, alleviating the issues in the other specifications. Why let changes ripple out like this? Why can't the infoset definitions be changed? Why does an element need namespace information items? I'm sure there's a good reason, I'm just not sure what it is. Cheers, L. -- Leigh Dodds, Research Group, Ingenta | "Pluralitas non est ponenda http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate" http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|