[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: SOAP and the Web

  • To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Subject: RE: SOAP and the Web
  • From: "Mike Deem" <mikedeem@m...>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 17:33:55 -0700
  • Cc: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>,<spolsky@p...>
  • Thread-index: AcHssl8zyhbJVQfDQ22qHWySNVRGUAABdrjg
  • Thread-topic: SOAP and the Web

soap merits
I'll stop lurking and make a technical point in favor of SOAP. Yes, I
have read the e-mail threads and the referenced articles. :-) I'm one of
the program managers at Microsoft that delivered the Microsoft SOAP
Toolkit.

My technical argument is this: all that matters when using SOAP is XML
and all the power of XML can be leveraged when building applications
that use SOAP.

I can use the same programming model for doing simple "safe" things as I
do for doing complex "unsafe" things. That programming model allows me
to leverage Schema, XSLT, XQuery, XPath, etc.

Granted, this may not be what SOAP tends to be *today*. But SOAP, at
least, enables us get there someday.

  == Mike ==

Mike Deem
Program Manager
XML Technologies
Microsoft Corporation

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] 
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Simon St.Laurent
Cc: xml-dev; spolsky@p...
Subject: Re:  SOAP and the Web

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> 
> Did you get anyone defending SOAP on its technical merits?

Technical merits?

Not really. There were quite a few who technically bashed it in response
to Joel's article though:

 * http://discuss.fogcreek.com/joelonsoftware/default.asp

> You and Mark Baker seem to present more technical defense than any of
> the "advocates", which has me thoroughly confused.
> 
> (Don Box did bring up a common framing format[1], but I'm having a
hard
> time seeing the format mitigating the overall approach.)

Actually, if I get time I will write an article on how XML is a lousy
envelope format (whatever its other virtues!).

 Paul Precod

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.