[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
From: "Peter Murphy" <peterm@f...> > > <conclusion> > > Get rid of the XML declaration and we can all be a lot more relaxed about > > making small, incremental changes to the XML specifications. Does anyone > > agree, or should I get my flame-proof underwear on? > > > > Apart from setting the XML version number, the declaration may describe the > character encoding for the document. <snip> They would not like to lose this ability. > Of course, the encoding declaration is very useful and I certainly wouldn't argue for its removal. I should have been more precise - its the version attribute that's the source of the problem, not the XML declaration itself. ~Rob
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|