[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: canonical
Just out of curiousity, what about providing mechanisms by which a schema could constrain conforming documents to not permit entities? Then, those who have use for them could still use them, but those who don't can protect themselves from having unwanted entities flung at them in documents. Is there any value in such an approach? > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Lugt [mailto:roblugt@e...] > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:44 AM > To: xml-dev@l...; Tim Bray > Subject: Re: Re: What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: > > canonicalization] > > > Tim Bray wrote:- > > > > > More good arguments for getting rid of entities. -Tim > > > > So far, I haven't seen one good enough argument for getting rid of > entities - or anything else in XML 1.0. > > Remember, one feature that made XML attractive and that set it above > proprietary formats was the proposition that XML 1.0 > documents would be > readable for many years to come. By all means layer > additional features on > top if you have to, but remove things at your peril. > > Kind regards > ~Rob > > -- > Rob Lugt > ElCel Technology > http://www.elcel.com/ > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|