[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't dese rve it
> ... What I'd like to see are examples and design > patterns that show how subtitution groups and abstract types > can be used to build polymorphic apps that adapt well to > schema evolution. I think that's an excellent suggestion for an addition to the Best Practices web site[1]. There's already some coverage there on Schema versioning (thanks, Priscilla); Schema robusting(?) would go hand-in-hand with that. I offer some thoughts on that subject in soon-to-be published book <?whoTooted?>, but an open discussion of tried and true approaches would certainly educate us all. [1] http://www.xfront.com/BestPracticesHomepage.html [2] http://www.manning.com/lowery/index.html
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|