[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?

  • To: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>,"Ronald Bourret" <rpbourret@r...>,<xml-dev@l...>
  • Subject: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:39:41 -0800
  • Thread-index: AcHR6a9Dh0jLtyO0R46ZxUBVuyGCVAAABhUg
  • Thread-topic: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?

RE:  Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
Title: Message
Exactly. xs:restriction with no children is effectively a renaming mechanism.
 
 
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
You assume all risk for your use. © 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-----Original Message-----
From: CHIUSANO, Joseph [mailto:JCHIUSANO@l...]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:36 PM
To: 'Ronald Bourret'; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?

<Snip>
what is the point of allowing an xsd:restriction element with no children?
</Snip>

If I read your question correctly (apologies if I'm not), here's a case where this *might* be useful:

Suppose I've defined a simple type of string length 5 as follows:

        <xsd:simpleType name = "StringLength5Type">
                <xsd:restriction base = "xsd:string">
                        <xsd:maxLength value = "5" fixed = "true"/>
                </xsd:restriction>
        </xsd:simpleType>

I can reuse this definition in other simple type definitions - for instance, to declare another simple type that is also string length 5:

<xsd:simpleType name = "SomeNewCodeType">
     <xsd:restriction base = "StringLength5Type"/>
</xsd:simpleType>

Regards,
Joe Chiusano
LMI

> **************************************************************************
>   Joseph M. Chiusano
>   Logistics Management Institute
>   2000 Corporate Ridge
>   McLean, VA 22102
>   Email: jchiusano@l...
>   Tel: 571.633.7722
> **************************************************************************
>


-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@r...]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:21 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?


OK. Now that I finally understand why this is invalid, what is the point
of allowing an xsd:restriction element with no children? Is it
specifically to allow me to restrict content down to emptiness and yet
still get the OO advantages (?) of using a restriction?

-- Ron

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.