[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve
3/5/2002 3:37:12 PM, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> wrote: >Ummm... what's the difference in in-bandness in >the instance vs just requiring a schema of some kind to >travel with the document, other than that puts one back >in SGMLLand pretty solidly? Hmmm ... interesting point. Having a travelling schema would address my original concern. > >We do seem to work a lot to preserve well-formed options. Well, well-formedness brought us to the party, IMHO. We would be a lonely group of SGMLers whining about the incompatibilities between Word and HTML, and CORBA and DCOM, and wishing that the world would just take a sip of our KoolAid -- XML would have never "taken off" without the WF "foot in the door." I suspect you disagree :~)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|