[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve
What exactly was your original concern and how is it not solved by xsi:type? -- THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #230 I will not procrastinate regarding any ritual granting immortality. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:48 PM > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: Re: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: > XML doesn't deserve its "X".) > > > 3/5/2002 3:37:12 PM, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" > <clbullar@i...> wrote: > > >Ummm... what's the difference in in-bandness in > >the instance vs just requiring a schema of some kind to > >travel with the document, other than that puts one back > >in SGMLLand pretty solidly? > > Hmmm ... interesting point. Having a travelling schema > would address my original concern. > > > > >We do seem to work a lot to preserve well-formed options. > > Well, well-formedness brought us to the party, IMHO. We > would be a lonely group of SGMLers whining about the > incompatibilities between Word and HTML, and CORBA and DCOM, > and wishing that the world would just take a sip of our > KoolAid -- XML would have never "taken off" without the WF > "foot in the door." I suspect you disagree :~) > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org > <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|