[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn'tdeserve its

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn'tdeserve its "X".)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 05 Mar 2002 15:02:56 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1015358285.899.2.camel@l...>
• References: <XVKIXWOKTQMIYXIC2YOMLJICQP3VFAOK.3c850db9@MChamp> <1015358285.899.2.camel@l...>

On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 14:57, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> It's more a document-centric perspective than the ASN.1 example you
> suggest, but it's interesting stuff.

Didn't finish my thought, sorry.  It seems like Ted Nelson's ideas about
parallel markup may have been picked up by the schema folks, though
their parallel markup applies to markup, not just raw text.

I like the purely in-band approach, but I guess Regular Fragmentations
makes that pretty clear.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn'tdeserve its "X".)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML with PHP
• Next by Date: Re: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn'tdeserve its "X".)
• Previous by thread: Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn'tdeserve its "X".)
• Next by thread: A very interesting patent related article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread