[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
[Thomas B. Passin] > [Jason Diamond] > To: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>; <xml-dev@l...> > > > Question: > > > > > > Is the below document "conforming" with regard to the XML-Namespaces > rec? > > > > > > <root xmlns:a="" /> > > > > Nope. > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#dt-prefix > > > Ironically, the paragraph Jason points to covers __non__-default > namespaces, while the following paragraph, which does cover default > namespaces, specifically says that an "empty" value is acceptable. So the > answer to the question is "yes" after all. > Talk about misreading! I read it as <root xmlns=""/> even though it clearly didn't say that. Sorry for the confusion. Clearly the "not allowed" answer is what the Rec says. Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|