[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Namespaces best practices
Don't forget that the subject is political as well as technical ;-) Cheers, Manos > -----Original Message----- > From: Friedland, Zachary (TLP 2001) > [mailto:ZFriedland@e...] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:41 PM > To: 'xml-dev@l...' > Subject: Namespaces best practices > > > I'd like to get some feedback on a past topic that never > seems to get resolved: Namespaces best practices. The 3 > options out there seem to be: > > (1) Homogeneous Namespaces across applications. > - All XML schemas use the same namespaces, and the > developers make sure to avoid collisions > > (2) Heterogeneous Namespaces across applications. > - All XML schemas use different namespaces, and the > developers have to do manage reading / writing / XSLT to > different systems > > (3) Chameleon / Proxy namespaces. > - All applications maintain one external namespace, and use > proxies or chameleon methods to have many internal XML namespaces. > > I would love to hear developers / architect's feedback on how > scaleable these different methods are, how easy it is to > reuse XML Schema assets, and how manageable the namespaces are. > > Thanks > Zach Friedland > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|