[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
Bill Lindsey wrote: > >> * Could this property be also be obtained for > >> elements? > > > Sure, why not? > > Either you misunderstood my question, or you might > reconsider using "document type" to name this property. Right; I usually call this (the principle representation form of an element) an "element type" (but not in mixed company :-) Having thought more about the second question, I now believe that the only thing that's intrinsic to an XML document is the stuff that's manifest in the parse tree: GIs, attributes, and content. Everything else -- the principal type, auxilliary types, architectural forms, etc., -- are imposed by the observer. --Joe English jenglish@f...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|