[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks

• To: 'Sean McGrath' <sean.mcgrath@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:58:08 -0600

So in short, this meme will win like HTML did despite 
better alternatives.  Then a few years later after 
the heros' shoes are bronzed, the money is made, 
the leadership positions are secure, we'll be 
back cleaning up the mess.

Sounds like business.  kaching!

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean McGrath [mailto:sean.mcgrath@p...]

Here is one possible reading of the tea leaves of the HTTPectomy meme.
By the time they are doing that, I fear the world will have forgotten that REST
presented an alternative, and I would argue significantly more powerful,
data-flow based approach to building systems.

• Prev by Date: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Next by Date: RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML to object relational
• Next by thread: RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread