[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Two Perspectives (was Re: URIs are simply names R)


Re: Two Perspectives (was Re:  URIs are simply names R)


Outstanding post, Steve. Worthy of framing ;-)

Your two perspectives very well illustrate the divergence
between the web and semantic web that I've sensed for some
time (though not as clearly as your post presents them).

I think that one of the key ways in which the W3C can
support perspective 2 is to accept that the present, low
resolution and non-formal "contemporary view" of URI
classification does not meet the needs of perspective 2
and consider very hard how balance can be achieved in that
crucial area.

The rest, I think, will follow from that.

Cheers,

Patrick



On 2002-02-15 21:12, "ext Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@c...> wrote:

> "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...> writes:
> 
>> It would be helpful to read the relevent documents
>> because there is really no point in arguing what is
>> "logical" when we are defining our basic terms in a
>> different fashion.
> 
> It all depends on which documents you regard as
> relevant.  In SGML, for example, an "entity" is a very
> different thing.  And so is a "resource".
> 
> It is very useful and revealing to see the whole
> history of our field as a conflict between two
> perspectives:
> 
> (1) The perspective of those who provide bandwidth
>     and processing, and
> 
> (2) the perspective of those who provide and maintain
>     information.
> 
> From Perspective 2, which is the perspective on which
> SGML is based, it is nonsensical to define what
> information is (or to think of information in terms of)
> what a process produces, or in terms of a
> communications protocol.  For Perspective 2,
> information just sits somewhere, occupying real space.
> Its "location" can be addressed in countless ways, in
> terms of other information -- other information that
> also "just sits there".  For Perspective 2, information
> really, really exists, it has real value (in that
> access to it can improve human productivity), its
> maintenance absorbs real human effort, and it does
> absolutely nothing.
> 
> From Perspective 1, which is the perspective on which
> the Web and all other communications and computing
> systems are based, it is nonsensical to think of
> information in any terms than other "information in
> motion", either being copied from one place to another,
> or being transformed in various ways.  Perspective 1
> has little reverence for the value of the information
> itself, or for the effort involved in maintaining it.
> Perspective 1 frequently (and, to my way of thinking,
> ignorantly and self-defeatingly) tramples on,
> diminishes, and destroys the value of information in
> many ways.  But the Perspective 1 guys have nearly all
> of the money and virtually all of the power.  This is
> because Perspective 1 is in a much stronger position to
> set up the toll booths and collect tolls.
> 
> Perspective 1 is so unconcerned with the value of
> information that it doesn't bother to distinguish
> between the Eiffel Tower and addressable information
> that serves as a surrogate for the Eiffel Tower;
> they're both just a "resource".  Perspective 1 is so
> blithely unconcerned with the problem of information
> management that there doesn't even have to be anything
> at the addresses that are used to uniquely identify
> individual XML Namespaces.
> 
> The predominance of Perspective 1 is the reason why the
> Web is such an appallingly bad place to *manage*
> information, even while it's a great place to *publish*
> it.
> 
> Of course, the two perspectives need each other
> desperately.  It has been my hope that the XML
> phenomenon would be a bridge-builder between them.  The
> jury's still out on that.  For the last few years,
> things haven't been looking very promising.
> 
> Things began badly for Perspective 2, when the
> Perspective 1 people overlooked the primary benefit of
> SGML, and decided to make it unnecessary to provide a
> model for XML information.  Except for the enablement
> of some tricky hacks that were made possible by this
> end-run -- hacks whose goals could have been
> accomplished by other, less destructive means -- this
> was a fruitless thing to have done.  It has had the
> unfortunate side-effect of keeping millions of people
> from discovering the vital importance of Perspective 2.
> XML Namespaces was another major blow to Perspective 2:
> names were seen as a solution to a communications
> problem, rather than as handles for specific semantics.
> (The two sides have consistently talked right past each
> other on XML Namespaces; the spectacle would be comical
> if it weren't so incredibly expensive for everyone.)
> 
> I see the confusing welter of confused, non-modular XML
> specifications as a hopeful sign.  The Babel effect is
> slowing the pendulum down, and it may soon reverse its
> course, and move toward Perspective 2.  I hope it does.
> If enhancing human productivity is truly the shared
> goal, balance must someday prevail.  At the moment,
> most people are on one side or the other, but few
> realize that there is even a dialectic tension here,
> much less what the lack of balance between the two
> perspectives is costing everyone on this planet.  When
> we all appreciate the value of the other side's
> perspective, things will improve a lot.
> 
> It looks to me as though the W3C, having sinned
> grievously against Perspective 2, is now starting to
> move toward it.  I nourish the hope that this is the
> real meaning of the "Semantic Web" initiative.  If so,
> it's going to be a tough and divisive path for the W3C
> to follow, and I wish them well.  I find many of their
> efforts to describe the goals of the Semantic Web as
> Delphic as others do.  It would be a lot clearer if
> they could be seen to embrace Perspective 2, but it may
> not be possible to do that, in view of the overwhelming
> quantity of their Perspective 1 baggage.
> 
> OASIS has long been much more sensitive to Perspective
> 2 than the W3C has.  I applaud them for their longtime
> efforts to achieve a better balance.
> 
> But I'm willing to support anybody who appreciates the
> importance and necessity of supporting Perspective 2.
> Perspective 2 is the underdog, and *balance* is what is
> needed.
> 
> I'm an ISO guy, myself.  ISO, the source of SGML, is a
> Perspective 2 stronghold.  It's a source of ideas that
> Perspective 1 people have been extremely unwilling to
> support, like HyTime, architectural forms, and groves,
> and things that tend to make Perspective 1 people
> pretty nervous, like Topic Maps.
> 
> What will .NET turn out to be?  I'm no insider, but I'm
> willing to bet that Microsoft is preparing to be where
> the pendulum is going to be -- which is a lot closer to
> Perspective 2 than it is now.
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> Steven R. Newcomb, Consultant
> srn@c...
> 
> voice: +1 972 359 8160
> fax:   +1 972 359 0270
> 
> 1527 Northaven Drive
> Allen, Texas 75002-1648 USA
> 
> 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@n...



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.