[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XPointer crisis
On Friday 01 February 2002 04:36 pm, Joe English wrote: > Re: the 'xml:id' and 'xml:idattr' proposals: these sound reasonable, > but it seems to me like an awful lot of work to specify, implement, > and deploy just for the sake of barename fragment identifiers. Right, they fall into the category of "specious standardization". I really can't see the point in standardizing a mechanism *that can already be used* but for which no experience exists. I say standardize only the bare minimum necessary...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|