[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names

• To: jborden@a...
• Subject: Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:34:00 GMT
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <022201c1b8dc$0b8891a0$0301a8c0@n...>(jborden@a...)
• References: <200202181422.OAA04464@p...> <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05573B41@r.... com> <008201c1b82d$a0d2e760$0301a8c0@n...> <1014005493.943.230.camel@l...> <00ab01c1b832$94ce2ce0$0301a8c0@n...> <200202181028.KAA00561@p...> <010301c1b888$7a86c440$0301a8c0@n...> <200202181641.g1IGfGj28557@d...> <200202181659.QAA10641@p...> <01b501c1b8a3$8fb701c0$0301a8c0@n...> <200202181857.SAA12180@p...> <01ec01c1b8c2$a8d852c0$0301a8c0@n...> <200202182157.VAA12765@p...> <020601c1b8ce$b168e560$0301a8c0@n...> <200202182242.WAA12931@p...> <022201c1b8dc$0b8891a0$0301a8c0@n...>

> I recommend that such elements be qualified with a namespace name that
> resolves to a short document:

Yes of course, but good practice in choice of names is at a completely
different level to discussion of what the meaning of an element name is.
It's the same with namespace names. Any proposed meaning for namespace
names has to encompass both good and bad names, whatever that may mean.
Saying that a namespace is (or is uniquely associated with) the resource
identified by the namespace name if used as a URI reference fails this
test.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>

• Prev by Date: XML API vs. Object API
• Next by Date: regd security while transmitting XML Data
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread