[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web

• To: 'Paul Prescod' <paul@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:31:45 -0600

Yeah, that's a rabbit trail today.  It just hit 
me that it is an interesting approach to the 
problem of having the same web service with 
different vocabularies per service type.  It 
is almost a topic map for the service semantics.

But I am also brain fried.  Stayed up too late 
rehearsing and Steely Dan is full of fat chords.
I should stick Agnetha, Benny, Bjorn and Anni-Frid 
this week.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...]

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> 
> Isn't an architectural form a means to
> establish a reference group that uses a
> set of overlapping but distinct vocabularies?

My brain is working on too many fronts to add architectural forms today.
I'm not trying to be glib. It is certainly the case that architectural
forms are designed to solve many of the hairy ontological problems that
plague information systems. I can't say much more than that without
thinking.

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Next by Date: Re: Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames
• Previous by thread: Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Next by thread: Architectural Forms, A Summary
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread