[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v
> But consider that for the last several years, programmers have spent > a massive amount of effort figuring out how to make a "web > interface" to their software. Web application frameworks, J2EE, ASP, > PHP, etc. etc. Part of this is because people have spent the last > few years remapping their problem domains into the REST model. I think the "web interface" here is important as a test of REST and HTTP applicability. Not everyone needs, or wants a web interface... though most people want to leverage ubiquitous networking easily. At the end of the day, choice of architecture at this level is dictated by larger application architectures... and people should always remember that. Maybe HTTP/REST fits, maybe it doesn't. The best part of Roy's thesis is the definition and methodology of classifying and (subjectively) evaluating architectures. It provides a nice basis for experimenting with, discussing, and evaluating new network architectures and implementations thereof. It'd be interesting to see someone design a protocol explicitly optimised for the REST architecture... I'm picking it'd look something like BEEP.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|