[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms

• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:58:25 +1100
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020131083303.02814c60@p...> <m37kpym99c.fsf@d...> <3C59B86C.DC7C9084@p...> <E16WPTh-0001zW-00@s...>

 From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@r...>

> > The whole XML world is organized around the idea that the GI is the
> > *type name*. 
> 
> The name is not the same as the thing. I think the whole idea that gi 
> == type to be one of the biggest peices of misinformation around. 

I think the problem is not so much people thinking that Generic Identifier == type
but more that Generic Identifier = table name!

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Prev by Date: Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
• Next by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread