[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Namespaces best practices
I'd like to get some feedback on a past topic that never seems to get resolved: Namespaces best practices. The 3 options out there seem to be: (1) Homogeneous Namespaces across applications. - All XML schemas use the same namespaces, and the developers make sure to avoid collisions (2) Heterogeneous Namespaces across applications. - All XML schemas use different namespaces, and the developers have to do manage reading / writing / XSLT to different systems (3) Chameleon / Proxy namespaces. - All applications maintain one external namespace, and use proxies or chameleon methods to have many internal XML namespaces. I would love to hear developers / architect's feedback on how scaleable these different methods are, how easy it is to reuse XML Schema assets, and how manageable the namespaces are. Thanks Zach Friedland
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|