[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: WSIO and Good is Better

• To: 'Mike Champion' <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: WSIO and Good is Better
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:24:06 -0600

So everyone gets to have their own skunk works these days.

"We envision applications of XML where a single XML document may contain elements and attributes from more than one markup vocabulary. One motivation for this is modularity; if such a markup vocabulary exists which is well-understood and for which there is useful software available, it is better to re-use this markup rather than re-invent it."

http://www.textuality.com/xml/xmlSW.html

Do you think that is universally true?

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...]

For various reasons, the W3C is no longer a useful forum for 
"lets just make this WORK" discussions. 

• Prev by Date: RE: Documents within documents
• Next by Date: RE: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v
• Previous by thread: Re: WSIO and Good is Better
• Next by thread: RE: WSIO and Good is Better
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread