[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Generality of HTTP
Mark Baker wrote, > John Cowan wrote, > > Bricks, lots and lots of bricks. They need brick: URIs. > > And when you GET them, you don't get much. > > Not a problem for the mighty HTTP protocol and URI scheme; > > http://www.markbaker.ca/2002/01/Bricks/ Oh dear ... I've already used that URI to denote the class of people who don't have a firm grip on the concept of naming ;-) Question 1: What's to stop me doing that? Question 2: If there's nothing to stop me, what does this tell us about the usefulness of private conventions involving the use of http: URIs as names? Question 3: Why is the http: URI scheme any better (or worse) than any other in this regard? Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin InterX Internet Systems Architect 27 Great West Road +44 (0)20 8817 4030 Middx, TW8 9AS, UK msabin@i... http://www.interx.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|