[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
At 08:57 AM 31/01/02 -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: >The W3C also has to give up superstitions. On the >other hand, AFs were discussed very seriously and >I'm still not sure what the killer objections were. In my recollection, the main objection was that the AF syntax for namespacing on attributes was seen as really unattractive. If we had wanted to do namespaces on just elements, not attributes, I'm pretty sure we would have ended up with AFs or equivalent. -Tim
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|