[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: QNames in attribute values
Evan Lenz wrote: > >... > > <troll $NS=""> > If SGML compatibility isn't a constraint for XML 2.0, perhaps it should use > something other than an attribute-like syntax. And they could be made global > instead of scoped to elements... > </troll> I'll take a whack at that troll. The SGML-heads tried to make namespaces global and (IIRC, use a syntax other than attributes). But here's Tim Berners-Lee's opinion: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Extensible.html#Local SGML compatibility had nothing to do with the scoped attribute syntax. Also: 4.9) Why are special attributes used to declare XML namespaces? I don't know the answer to this question, but the likely reason is that they simplify the process of moving fragments of one document to another document. An early draft of the XML namespaces recommendation proposed using processing instructions to declare XML namespaces. While these were simple to read and process, they weren't easy to move to other documents. Attributes, on the other hand, are intimately attached to the elements being moved. http://www.rpbourret.com/xml/NamespacesFAQ.htm Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|