[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDDL
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:31:09AM -0800, Paul T wrote: | Why should I call *purpose* *arcrole*, if it is *purpose* I believe the RDDL spec here is defining an application of xlink. Thus, the spec would like to use the word "purpose" and "nature", to maintain compatibility with with xlink, RDDL must use "role" and "arcrole" instead. ... This made me think that for "mixing" schema, it might be nice to allow some way to do some inheritance such that "rddl:purpose" overrides "xlink:role" so that a xlink (but not rddl) aware browser could show the rddl:purpose as an xlink... I'm not a schema person; but is something like this in the works? or is it just acedemically interesting? Best, Clark
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|