[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ANN: Gorille 0.3
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > Surrogate pairs are very tricky critters that seem to me to require > substantially more programming care than any other aspect of Unicode, > and I suspect that developers will be cursing them for a long time to come. When you are using a language that hard-codes "char" to mean "16 bits", then yes. > The testing I've been able to perform so far is pretty crude stuff. If > anyone with more experience in Unicode or better tools for creating test > documents has time to explore this work, I'd greatly appreciate it. As > XML 1.0 parsers already perform some of this testing, creating tests > that go outside of those bounds and reach gorille (not just the parser) > is tricky. IIRC, Aelfred (not Aelfred2) doesn't actually check these things. A JAXP wrapper for it might be useful. -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|