[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Time to put SGML out to pasture?
So nice to have a vacation. James' remark seems more ill-mannered than technical or was a fawlty towers attempt at humor, but let that go. ISO owns SGML and nothing said here or there changes that. SGML is an international standard and still a working beast; there is no call to marginalize or "stab". XML and SGML may go separate ways, but that doesn't serve any interest well. It is time for ISO 8879 to be updated to reflect new requirements as any standard must. I don't know if SGML depends on XML to survive, but SGML must be kept current to be relevant regardless of provenance. The ISO/W3C alliance on markup is useful. Every time the XML community uses SGML and ISO as a whipping boy for its frustrations, the privatization of XML and the markup technologies by the commercial interests represented by the W3C increases. We complain about embrace and extend but don't notice that often we are making that possible with ill-considered tactics. We are not well served by a knife fight. We have to look ahead and understand that an organization that today looks invincible can very quickly become irrelevant. The XML leaders take public positions which any serious business analyst knows are untenable (patents, small vs large companies, etc) with predictable results. So take these for what they are: politics of the moment. As for the rest of the speech, we should consider those remarks separately. XML is now on a path some will welcome and others will see as self-limiting. Preserve options. I agree that the foundations should be made solid and with most of the rest. Happy New Year to all! Praying for rain in Sydney... len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|